Over the years, radiology has moved from a mode of treatment used only for a few medical areas to a discipline involved in the treatment of several diseases. This has been made possible mainly by technology. New imaging tools made it possible to access such areas of the human body as were not possible earlier making radiological contribution the foundation of uncountable number treatments.
But, although from a pure healthcare standpoint this phenomenon has been among the best things to happen, its impact mayn’t be as desirable on various aspects of the radiology industry. Firstly, it has meant more investment in infrastructure for medical outfits involved in radiology. This investment is high and of recurring nature as imaging tools don’t take long to become obsolete getting replaced by either a completely new technology or new devices offering better features relegating as a result the existing devices to be obsolete.
Technology has also had more direct impact on radiology. Today radiology has become the starting point of many more treatments than in the past and this has meant more workload or more number of procedures per radiologist leading to a shortfall of radiologists, in the US. Some figures will bear this out. From 2000 to 2003 total imaging in the US increased by 23 percent, much higher than the recorded increase from 1998 to 2000. However, surprisingly, in the years following 2003 the shortage was found to have eased out, instead of increasing, as was expected.
Studies say this could be due to a combination of three possibilities:
With the passage of time workload per radiologist became less than was expected- There is enough data to reveal that this has not happened. Instead of a decrease in workload, there has been a considerable increase in it with passage of years.
More radiologists joined the radiology stream- Being a demanding specialty, radiology, especially in the US, requires a lot of qualifications, both technical and regulatory in nature and, of course, a long period of time (about five years) to acquire them. Which rules out the possibility that enough candidates would have covered the entire cycle of qualification, joined the radiology industry and become efficient enough to check the shortage.
More work completed per radiologist- This, in essence, talks about productivity per person. Productivity may have increased due to technology but even in an environment of complete homogeneity, productivity varies from person to person and the collective variance becomes wider with the increase in number of procedures each radiologist performs. Given this, productivity is a slippery slope to base your assumption on.
The missing link here is teleradiology which had found a boost due to the Internet around 1996 and which grew into a more widely-accepted-industry practice in the early years of the previous decade.
Teleradiology has helped the radiology industry to tide over the shortage by helping physicians and clinics to outsource the diagnostic part of imaging procedure, leverage round the clock service by taking up more imaging work and improving revenues and find access to qualified radiologists. However, teleradiology has – and not without reasons – come in for criticism for lack of quality in diagnosis and for being, to some extent, responsible for introduction of HIPPA (to ensure privacy of medical data).
SearchRadiologist brings together all the aspects of a complete radiology solution starting a robust, multilayered quality program to check quality of images; their compliance with HIPPA; accuracy of diagnosis (which is done by radiologists consulting a panel of experts if required); and submission of processed images via appropriate software platforms ensuring complete data protection.


